Saturday, February 7, 2009

Larry Hughes = Stephon Marbury? Not Exactly.

So it seems as though Larry Hughes has been “Marburied” on the Bulls’ bench. Basically this just means that as a player, he has no future with the team, and he happens to be signed to a large contract; more than he’s worth. As a fan of the team, I’m happy. Larry Hughes does not belong on the floor. There were questions as to what would happen when Kirk Hinrich came back from his injury, and this seems the best solution moving forward for the team. He did play pretty well for a period, and actually has the only game-winning shot for the team this season, sinking the Jazz after a fortunate rebound went his way. But in the long term, Hughes has no future with the Bulls. So what’s wrong with Larry Hughes? Well, he takes a lot of bad shots. So many, that when he played for the Cleveland Cavaliers, a fan created the website, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com. That says it all. Too many times we have seen him jack up a shot literally inches in front of the 3-point line, with a defender in his face, and 20 seconds left on the shot clock. Not what you want to see. Don’t get me wrong – Larry Hughes is by no means a bad basketball player. He has some skills. He’s a capable scorer. But on this team, he’s one of the last options. The problem is that he believes he should be a 1st option. The team already has a shooter in Ben Gordon who takes a lot of shots. Hughes may be a better defender than BG, but he’s not nearly as good a shooter, and we don’t need them both taking 90% of the team’s shots. Anyway, the Bulls took him as part of the deal that sent Ben Wallace to the Cavs. Wallace was himself locked into a overpaid contract, so taking Hughes in return was not much of an option. Hughes was somewhat serviceable this season in the absence of Captain Kirk, but with Hinrich back in the lineup, that leaves no room for Hughes. Even as a bench player, Hughes was unhappy. He felt he should be a starter. Then, he had a long string of DNP-CDs, and was even more unhappy. Finally, the Bulls put him on the inactive list, making his career in Chicago all but over. The Bulls now have to hope that 1) they can find a team that is willing to trade for him, and 2) that the injury bug does not return to the Bulls backcourt. Point 2 isn’t even that much of a risk, as Thabo Sefolosha has proven a capable reserve, and the team still has Lindsey Hunter at the end of the bench. Now, I must say, I feel a little bad for Hughes. Yes, as a player, I’m glad he’s not playing for the team. But I feel bad for him as a person, because Hughes has been a fairly good sport during all this. He publicly complained about playing time once, and the coaches and management spoke with him and put a stop to that. Now, he is understandably unhappy at not playing. I would be too; but he appears to have been rather silent about it all. He is by no means one of the worst players in the NBA. The reason I feel bad is that during his string of DNPs, he was asked by the media how he felt. He responded that he just wanted to help the team and earn his paycheck; he doesn’t like earning all this money while not playing. I must say, this is rather commendable. In an era where players make more money than they know what to do with, and most athletes in general come off as greedy to the average fan, Hughes at least understands why he’s paid so much, and just wants to earn it. Good for him. The problem is, the Bulls don’t want him; they were forced to take him. I only hope that the team can make a deal soon, and Hughes can go earn his paycheck elsewhere.

1 comment:

  1. I've actually got a history with Larry Hughes. I remember loving the guy when he came out of college. He was a dominant player for Saint Louis Univ. and gave Louisville fits. I even think he made some noise in the NCAA tournament, but I just remember the blue unis and that he came out after his freshman year. This was back when even the most talented kids were still playing 3 years of college ball.

    His career arc was pretty interesting. Looks like he started out buried in Philly, but picked up AI's volume-shooter model. Then Philly gave up on him too early, and he went to GSW, where for some reason, they had nobody on the team and let Larry play 41 mpg, shooting as much as he wanted. He got decent steals numbers, too. I guess he played out the end of that contract, and then managed to get a pretty decent contract with the Wiz. He had one REALLY good season in Washington (22/6/5, 3 stls, shooting a career high 43%). Looks like this was his contract year, and then he got his big deal. Washington didn't want to sign him, but then later decided to pay a guy with bad knees and questionable winning credentials $111M. Hughes took 70/5 from Cleveland.


    Hughes said some controversial things in Cleveland about winning not being very important to him, and that he was just happy to be playing basketball for a living and travelling and enjoying the money and living the life of an NBA baller. I do remember he lost his younger brother a few years ago, and I'm sure this affected his mentality. I commend him for being honest, but teams are going to stay far away from him.

    He's a very capable defender (at his peak, top 5 in NBA) who just never learned how to shoot efficiently. He just recently (within the last 3 years) figured out how to become serviceable from 3pt range, and his career FT% is a little low for a 2-guard. He just turned 30, and I doubt anyone will want to sign him to a big contract when his current deal expires in 2010. He also wants to be a starter. Seems like his interest in travelling and playing and getting paid seems like a nice fit for some team in Europe. Heck, I would do it too, if interest around the NBA was a little lukewarm.

    It's funny. I remember thinking he could be special 10 years ago when I saw him play in college, and maybe had he ended up with another set of teams and coaches, he could have been really good. Popovich could have done wonders with him.

    ReplyDelete